[Nottingham] Gentoo dead
Philip Scott
pgs31 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Apr 28 01:44:55 BST 2004
Heyho,
> I saw a benchmark once that put the speed difference between gentoo and
> $distro (i think debian and red hat in that example) somewhere between
> 'none' and 'within the error margins of the test'. Most distros also
> have the advantage that you don't have to watch gcc humping the cpu for
> hours on end.
Well, 'speed' is a very, very subjective term - and all the arguments either
way have already been made a thousand times. Whatever the reality, it is
rather nice to feel like your operating system is tailored to your
computer :) It feels like a nice expensive suite instead of a cheap-n-nasty
'One size fits all affair'
But oddly enough, I don't use Gentoo for speed reasons - I use it because I
really think it's a beautiful creation. It feels like something that was
designed, rather than something that evolved. It has wonderful documentation,
it has a vibrant community, it has really really nice good support for proper
desktops :) I won't slag off any others by name, but lets say I have had
trouble in the past keeping things up to date sensibly. The Gentoo KDE 3.2
ebuild was around before the KDE team made their release.
I know some people don't like pretty desktops, and who want software that was
released two years ago running on their machines - but I am not one of them
and Gentoo suites me down to the ground.
Each unto his own, I say.
Nighty night you luggers!
- Philip
PS - GCC is fun to watch.
PPS - The day I just want to 'get on with a job' (and no one is paying me)
with my PC is the day I start looking for a new hobby ;)
PPPS - I do not mean to start a distro or flame war, if you wish to crush my
arguments one by one to prove me wrong on all accounts, please do so - but
spare the mailing list and mail me personally 8*)
More information about the Nottingham
mailing list