[Nottingham] distro chance

[Roger Light]

> >>> huggie at earth.li 06/07/04 12:30 PM >>>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:12:52PM +1000, Andrew Mason wrote:
> > > Personally, I'd take a look at Gentoo. It's certainly my favourite, although
> > > it'd possibly be even better with precompiled binaries as well. 
> >
> > Yes it would =) 

> But then you'd lose out on the only advantage it has.  I never bought
> the optimising for your processor advantage personally but the
> optimising by compiling out/in stuff might be useful.

I don't believe there are significant gains in optimising for the processor either. Loosing the compiling in/out would be a pain, but then again I mostly use it to optimise on compile time. Do I want to compile the chat client in mozilla? No thanks. If the precompiled binaries were available I wouldn't be waiting for the chat client to compile, so it wouldn't be a problem. This is of course a very limited viewpoint...

I love the init scripts. Seriously, they rock. Based on the way Free(?)BSD does it, each script has a list of dependancies so you don't have to faff around with changing the order of execution with S27 S99 etc, it just does it for you.

I am blissfully ignorant of what other distros are doing, so it is entirely possible they all do this now. It would be nice. I don't intend going back (except when I have to work with the Solaris machines at work... :)

> Still not useful enough for me that I'm prepared to spend my life
> compiling things but then I'm a Debian bigot as you all know.

Can't say it bothers me too much. I update the available packages with a cron job that also emails me if there is anything that can be updated. If there is, I just compile it the next night. Either way, I still probably get things before debian users (stable at least :) I'm just kidding, don't flame back.

Each to their own though - the real reason I settled on Gentoo was that it was the first distro that all of my laptop worked for without any bother. It's been inertia since then.

Cheers,

Roger

This message has been scanned but we cannot guarantee that it and any
attachments are free from viruses or other damaging content: you are
advised to perform your own checks.  Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.