[Nottingham] Cross platform IDE's
Michael Erskine
msemtd at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Feb 19 16:41:30 GMT 2007
On Monday 19 February 2007 16:09, stellafan at jjsh.org wrote:
> Obviously, this will be an important step for our company and we'll need
> to do some serious research before coming to a final decision, but at this
> stage I'm asking for any suggestions for suitable IDE's we should
> investigate. We're already going to look at Net Beans, PHP-GTK, possibly
> GTK itself. We don't need the *complete* portability of java, just the
> ability to make GUI apps that can be easily complied for different systems
> as needed.
Hi,
Many developers find that GUI apps are better built without the restrictions
of an IDE and prefer to code a gui in their favourite editor.
I like GUI builder features of an IDE for prototyping: e.g. NetBeans 5+
Matisse is excellent, Visual Perl/Tk widget edition also, and I'm warming to
Glade2 for languages with Glade interpreters, but as soon as we have run-time
construction of GUI elements with smart layout-managers an IDE can fail to
scale well.
Eclipse is my favourite IDE for Java development but I don't use any GUI
building plugins: I find it quicker to hand-code GUIs. Eclipse works well as
an IDE for C and Perl development also.
> Presently, we develop in Access / VBA, but as our main application has
> become more sophisticated, we were going to need to move over to an IDE
> proper, such as .net, but this seems like a daft idea, as it would limit
> our choices desktop wise ~ however, it gives you an idea of what level of
> sophistication we need.
Choose your language: mono (C#) may well suit your developers best and there
may be a familiar GUI building IDE available (maybe monodevelop?).
Regards,
Michael Erskine.
--
BOFH excuse #39:
terrorist activities
___________________________________________________________
Inbox full of spam? Get leading spam protection and 1GB storage with All New Yahoo! Mail. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
More information about the Nottingham
mailing list