[Nottingham] Eager Queues and GNU Hurd.
Martin
martin at ml1.co.uk
Tue Jan 23 22:02:03 GMT 2007
Roger Light wrote:
> On 23/01/07, Martin <martin at ml1.co.uk> wrote:
>> Jason Cozens wrote:
>
>> > ip addr add 10.100.138.110/24 brd + dev eth0 label eth0:test
>
> ...
>
>> My only guesses are that of parameters and/or is the "eth0:test"
>> accepted ok? Convention usually is for numerical names, eg "eth0:7" or
>> whatever is unique.
>>
>> How do you bind multiple processes to all listen on the _same_ port
>> number?
>
> By binding them to different addresses? Isn't the point that they're
> on different ip addresses? You can bind to lo, eth0 and so on
> separately, so why not eth0:0, eth0:1 ?
Exactly true.
I interpreted the question to assume multiple processes on the same ip
address.
I'm assuming there can be many processes listening on the same physical
device. Setting up many eth aliases seems to be a cumbersome way to go.
Then again, what was the question?
Cheers,
Martin
--
----------------
Martin Lomas
martin at ml1.co.uk
----------------
More information about the Nottingham
mailing list