[Nottingham] Easy network programming
andy at nosignal.org
Mon May 14 10:28:52 BST 2007
On 13 May 2007, at 11:40, Chris Burton wrote:
> When I can multihome on IPV6 and not be an LIR I might be more
> interested in it, at the moment I still see it as a bit of a toy
> thing as there arnt enough users to drive it forward.
I'm not sure of your operational background, so I apologise in
advance if I am teaching you to suck eggs, but ..
If this is something that you have a strong opinion about, then it is
probably worth voicing your opinion on the local (European/RIPE)
address-wg mailing list - it's almost a year now since the case was
refined and restated for v6 PI assignments :
There is a desire to keep the v6 default-free routing table small.
Breaking up PA into chunks to allow multihoming does not allow for this.
> Interesting concept here though http://ipv6porn.com/ to try and get
> more users.
This was debated on a number of operational lists that I am on, the
consensus was that the material would find its way onto v4 p2p sites,
because we don't collectively have a strong enough opposition to
Andy Davidson - ( http://www.andyd.net/ )
More information about the Nottingham