[Nottingham] Gentoo experts: emerge file collisions!?
Martin
martin at ml1.co.uk
Fri Aug 14 12:20:23 UTC 2009
Martin wrote:
[---]
> I'm logging the output to see what happens...
Well... The collisions still showed up:
>>> Installing (18 of 24) sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2
* checking 1313 files for package collisions
1000 files checked ...
* This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to other
* packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq
* owners / <filename>` to identify the installed package that owns a
* file. If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do
* NOT file a bug report. A bug report is only useful if it identifies at
* least two or more packages that are known to install the same file(s).
* If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came from
* then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough
* information to determine if a real problem exists. Please do NOT file
* a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org unless you report exactly which
* two packages install the same file(s). Once again, please do NOT file
* a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message.
*
* Detected file collision(s):
*
* /lib/libthread_db-1.0.so
* /lib/libpcprofile.so
* /lib/libSegFault.so
* /lib/libmemusage.so
* /usr/bin/ldd
* /usr/bin/lddlibc4
... And 313? in total.
portageq owners / /lib/libthread_db-1.0.so
Gives:
sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1
/lib/libthread_db-1.0.so
Which is no surprise.
So... What is the procedure to complete the update without breaking the
system the update is running on?
(Or is this just a case of over-caution in portage?)
Cheers,
Martin
--
----------------
Martin Lomas
martin at ml1.co.uk
----------------
More information about the Nottingham
mailing list