[Nottingham] Parcelforce

Dan Caseley dan at caseley.me.uk
Wed Jul 27 13:41:45 UTC 2011


Indeed, it was screen readers I was advocating for.
Seems that despite legislation, access to technology for the disabled is
pretty low priority for a lot of people.
That said (and like Martin said), it's up to the users who are disadvantaged
by AJAX sites that don't degrade well to complain.

On 27 July 2011 14:20, Richard Hodgson <rich at dearinternet.com> wrote:

> Back when I designed websites, I tended to used elinks to get an idea of
> how well the site would work with audio readers designed for those with
> sight issues.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 14:18, Dan Caseley <dan at caseley.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> I'm a software tester, and I'm only *just* coming to terms with letting
>> developers off with sites that don't work with Lynx.
>>
>>
>> On 27 July 2011 12:40, Jason Irwin <jasonirwin73 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I got a reply.  They have suggested that I downgrade to FF3.6 as
>>> they do not support FF5 on any operating system.  They seriously expect
>>> people to downgrade their systems just to use their site?  Someone call
>>> Steve Jobs!  Cancel the iPad2 as Parcelforce have not certified it!
>>> Tell HTC to scrap all future production until they are Parcelforce
>>> verified!
>>>
>>> Attached (hope it comes through) is the cheery little message one gets
>>> if one dares to use anything that is not full-fat Windows or a
>>> Parcelforce approved browser.
>>>
>>> I know that there are many browsers out there and I know perfectly well
>>> that they can have quirks/incompatibilities and I understand that they
>>> cannot test on every OS/browser combination (I certainly can't).  I
>>> normally know the browser I need to support (mostly do Intranet stuff);
>>> I develop in FF and then test in the target browser (usually IE6).  If I
>>> have time, I'll test on Opera and Safari too (not w3m or Lynx, sorry).
>>> I would never, ever go back to the bad-old days of "Best viewed with..."
>>> like Parcelforce are doing, and certainly not for a site that is
>>> public-facing.  Being openly hostile to approx 25% of potential clients
>>> is just bloody stupid.
>>>
>>> I hardly know where to begin with this, their gall is staggering.  Or
>>> maybe I just need to take a chill-pill...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason Irwin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nottingham mailing list
>>> Nottingham at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nottingham mailing list
>> Nottingham at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/nottingham/attachments/20110727/32332cb8/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Nottingham mailing list