[Nottingham] NHS care.data ('Anonymized' data really isn't - and here's why not)
Jason Irwin
jasonirwin73 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 19 09:12:21 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/14 19:15, Martin wrote:
> MP makes formal complaint to ICO over care.data patient records "grab"
> http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2327035/mp-makes-formal-complaint-to-ico-over-caredata-patient-records-grab
And it has been delayed by six months:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-26239532
I wonder what the cost of the initial "information" drop was? And now it
will need to be done again. Do it right the first time - it's cheaper in
the long run.
- --
╔═════════════╦══════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Jason Irwin ║ OpenPGP (GPG/PGP) Public Key: 0xD0C592B1 ║
║ ║ Import from hkp://subkeys.pgp.net ║
╚═════════════╩══════════════════════════════════════════╝
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTBHVBAAoJENB/hsnQxZKx3/wH/07J5HXPDN6pUbn9HGYboX+x
vTrIwTT/5PuK+mqTnhELpM/qtQiqntUlPlDeSEJsUv9g88YUzNZ5w1vEUBdtAMLE
rUyz9JOSn0NtvsSWnO+AvkOGYknLyBsdL6aSwFIAeuMQobpl/HLvCWyYz+WiwKZN
AjHHdwjESB7048jImXI7pPcNYZRKqZnjwy2lnqZ089+kOdL3mYCNbgUFvG35ydyD
RDWnjn0XP1BAZtGnXmg0b9ILitw2bA1QO74HK5hMimK/iHw4sX1ZntgSS4kX1DzG
umA5LzY0363WG6HZ8PHDmUx4VVkS8IVvys2h/9jVUI79imdJgP7uXA2YqLgXRdw=
=LIEr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Nottingham
mailing list