[Phpwm] SOAP/XMLRPC/ Web services question

[Rayhan Abdulmughnee]

What about REST?  I find its easier to work with than SOAP or RPC.

rayhan

> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:12:16 +0100
> From: david at codepoets.co.uk
> To: phpwm at mailman.lug.org.uk
> Subject: [Phpwm] SOAP/XMLRPC/ Web services question
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to be lazy and get someone else to answer this question
> without doing a quick and dirty demo... so here goes....
> 
> A client needs a remotely callable API for 3rd parties to hook into. To
> me this means Soap or XMLRPC or perhaps SCA/SDO ...
> 
> Anyway, I obviously need some form of authentication to take place (e.g.
> only authorised users can use it, and there can only be so many queries
> in a time period... etc etc)
> 
> So... I've made the assumption that cookies/sessions "work as normal"
> when making xmlrpc/soap calls? Is the same also true for SDO stuff?
> 
> Any thoughts as to one being better than another ? (soap vs xmlrpc vs SDO).
> 
> thanks
> David.
> 
> 
> 
> - --
> David Goodwin
> 
> [ david at codepoets dot co dot uk ]
> [ http://www.codepoets.co.uk       ]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFH8fxw/ISo3RF5V6YRAokzAKCEa9VqGgwAC8jtPqut8oo+Yk5sKgCfcU+b
> 2nNAhwuUxN2toYcbv9UNrPI=
> =D8jk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Phpwm mailing list
> Phpwm at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/phpwm

_________________________________________________________________
In a rush?  Get real-time answers with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_realtime_042008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/phpwm/attachments/20080401/9c2992cf/attachment.html