[SC.LUG] Re: Using FAT partitions r/w accessible from Linux and MS
XP
Roger Gibson
rcgibson at iee.org
Mon Feb 28 01:03:30 GMT 2005
I've found part of the answer to my query below, but do not understand
it. If I set a users flag in fstab, so
anyone can mount and unmount partitions, I can as a user unmount and
then mount the partitions so that I then own them. Time stamps then
carry across (chown did not seem to work). However, inspite of setting
vfat flags in fstab, I find that some files get case changes to lower
case when copied to the fat partitions. Not all but particularly ones
which are all upper case. Annoyingly, Bill G always gets the case
correctly.
Can anyone help with this? My published query (How to get FAT. LXF Jan
05 p 103) to Linux Format implied all would be well if I used vfat.
I use case to help quickly identify certain sorts of files, and have
many 1000s of lines of old Fortran, dating back to well before my first
Unix efforts on a Whitechapel Workstation (half MIP) in early 80s. It
would be a long tedious job to change now.
Roger Gibson wrote:
> Sorry to be asking such a questionable question, but I have managed
> (apparently successfully) to repartition my 2 hard discs by adding
> some FAT32 partitions. MS XP seems happy with these, and Suse 8.2
> recognises them, and read/writes to them quite happily.
>
> The only problem seems to be that when writing from Suse 8.2 using cp
> -p etc, the FAT partition refuses the timestamp and gives the copied
> file the current time. Otherwise everything looks fine. I can not
> think how access writes etc can affect the time stamp if I can write
> the file in the first place.
>
> This is quite important to me as I use this to support software on
> other installations, and having the same timestamp enables me to be
> sure of the up to dateness of files.
>
> Has anyone any ideas please, other than castigating me for treachery?
>
> I'll have to get to a meeting soon and put faces to names.
>
>
More information about the SC
mailing list