[sclug] Partitions on /dev/sdb
Alex Butcher
lug at assursys.co.uk
Mon Aug 21 15:43:09 UTC 2006
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Sapan Ganguly wrote:
> I've stuck a 500Gb RAID array on a machine under /dev/sdb. I'm just
> going to put data on it. Is there any technical reason for me not to
> just format and mount it as /dev/sdb? Or should I create a big
> partiton on it as /dev/sdb1 first? The reason I ask is that it seems
> to accept /dev/sdb as one big partition and I can apply /dev/sdb to my
> mount point, it seems to work. Am I going to run into a problem
> later?
Compatibility, and principle-of-least-surprise mainly. If you're never
planning on reading the array under a different OS, and you KNOW it's only
ever going to be you administrating the machine, it's your choice.
Personally, as I'm never really sure about the last one, I always make a
partition.
> Thanks,
> Sapan
Best Regards,
Alex.
--
Alex Butcher, Bristol UK. PGP/GnuPG ID:0x5010dbff
"[T]he whole point about the reason why I think it is important we go for
identity cards and an identity database today is that identity fraud and
abuse is a major, major problem. Now the civil liberties aspect of it, look
it is a view, I don't personally think it matters very much."
- Tony Blair, 6 June 2006 <http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page9566.asp>
More information about the Sclug
mailing list