Supporting distro re-packaging (Was: [sclug] Linux Apprentice Wanted !)
Patrick
patrick at kirks.net
Tue Nov 7 14:47:31 UTC 2006
[...]
> ?
>
> a) You seem to have provided a link to a folder full of source archives,
> not executables.
So I did :( If they can't provide pre-compiled executables, then really
I'm amazed. I thought that was the whole point of Mono.
>
> b) What Matt asserted was that, even if you had a single binary (ala
> Mono/Java/...; N.B. the same reasoning implicitly applies to even a
> single source for things that have no widely used binary form (Perl,
> bash, ...)), _all_ of the problems with packaging still arise.
>
> Do you in fact understand the problem with Debian builds of Apache? How
Should I need to? I'm neither an Apache developer nor a Debian
contributor, though I depend on both for a living. Installing packages
should not require immersion in jargon.
> might writing in Mono instead of C solve the
I said it wouldn't help ;-)
More information about the Sclug
mailing list