fine here too (which is good, considering how, well, "esoteric" Lotus Notes
can be at times ;o)
Ben Thorp
Graeme Thomson
<TMW2N at blueyonder.co.uk> To: SLUG-list <scottish at mailman.lug.org.uk>
Sent by: cc:
scottish-bounces at mailman Subject: Re: [Scottish] Mailing list changes
.lug.org.uk
11-12-03 07:12
Please respond to
SLUG-list
well, it appears to work perfectly fine here. assuming this goes to the
list, i'm happy
G
On 11 Dec 2003, at 03:12, Kyle Gordon wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've made some changes to the list options that should fix the
> reply-to issues we've been having. If someone wants to give it another
> test, on you go ;-)
>
> Currently mailman will not strip and replace any existing reply-to
> headers, this can be a good
> (http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html) thing and a bad
> (http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml) thing, and can be
> changed if required.
>
> Regards
>
> Kyle
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scottish mailing list
> Scottish at mailman.lug.org.uk
> http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
>
_______________________________________________
Scottish mailing list
Scottish at mailman.lug.org.uk
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish