[Sderby] SuSE 8.2

[James Gibbon]

David Jolley wrote:

> 
> Way ahead of you :)  Procmail is already on the case; I've
> modified my incorrect sig-seperator correction rule and added it
> in. The tricky part was actually entering the spurious character
> in my .procmailrc as part of the regexp :)
> 

Ah, but that was part of my point - I believe you'll find that 
the spurious character is translated from '=0D', which is the 
representation given by mime in the message body source - so the
regexp in your procmail rule should literally be '=0D$' - it
shouldn't contain the spurious character that it's translated 
to by your mailer.

Cheers,
James