[Sussex] Linus get's bitten on the arse

[Ronan Chilvers]

Geoffrey J. Teale wrote:
> Well, Linus made a bad decision and it has finally came back to bite him.
>
> I missed this news in the week, but here it is for those who are as
> uniformed as I am:
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/4966
>
>
> ... that's the real difference between "Free" (as in speech) and "free"
> (as in beer).  I use GNU Arch (or tla to it's friends) a lot and I
> imagine this would be the easiest transition for the kernel developers.
>

But is tla up to the job of maintaining such a massive codebase?  Its
development has had a slightly chequered history - wasn't there a hoohah
among the lead developers at one point - which resulted in a rather
grudging branch I seem to remember?

Just curious - never used tla properly although had a peek at it a while
back.

Cheers

--
Ronan

e: ronan at thelittledot.com
w: www.thelittledot.com
t: 01903 739 997
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/sussex/attachments/20050408/5806ba42/attachment.pgp