[Sussex] SLUGoppix : What's in a name

Dave Chapman linux-lists at ntlworld.com
Sun Aug 6 20:14:19 UTC 2006


On Sun August 6 2006 19:37, Steven Dobson wrote:

> Me, I like the name.
>
> I agree with you that for the average BCFer the name is not important.
> We could call it lsdffgbs and it wouldn't matter.
>
I disagree.
Can you pronounce "lsdffgbs"

Keep it short and memorable.
The acronym SLUG has a certain yuk factor which makes it memorable

>Nick suggested
Knoppix - the Sussex Linux User Group Edition.
My favourite so far.


	       Sussex 
Knoppix   Linux 
	       User 
	       Group Edition.

The letters SLUG in a different colour.


Dave



________________________________
this email was bought to you by the letters

S	L	U	G
 and the number 0.39




More information about the Sussex mailing list