[Sussex] SLUGoppix : What's in a name
Dave Chapman
linux-lists at ntlworld.com
Sun Aug 6 20:14:19 UTC 2006
On Sun August 6 2006 19:37, Steven Dobson wrote:
> Me, I like the name.
>
> I agree with you that for the average BCFer the name is not important.
> We could call it lsdffgbs and it wouldn't matter.
>
I disagree.
Can you pronounce "lsdffgbs"
Keep it short and memorable.
The acronym SLUG has a certain yuk factor which makes it memorable
>Nick suggested
Knoppix - the Sussex Linux User Group Edition.
My favourite so far.
Sussex
Knoppix Linux
User
Group Edition.
The letters SLUG in a different colour.
Dave
________________________________
this email was bought to you by the letters
S L U G
and the number 0.39
More information about the Sussex
mailing list