[Sussex] SLUGoppix : What's in a name

[Andrew Guard]

> On Sun August 6 2006 19:37, Steven Dobson wrote:
>
>> Me, I like the name.
>>
>> I agree with you that for the average BCFer the name is not important.
>> We could call it lsdffgbs and it wouldn't matter.
>>
> I disagree.
> Can you pronounce "lsdffgbs"
>
> Keep it short and memorable.
> The acronym SLUG has a certain yuk factor which makes it memorable
>
>>Nick suggested
> Knoppix - the Sussex Linux User Group Edition.
> My favourite so far.
>
>
> 	       Sussex
> Knoppix   Linux
> 	       User
> 	       Group Edition.
>
> The letters SLUG in a different colour.

That is just confusing, names should be short and simple.  That the great
thing about Slugoppix.


-- 
This e-mail has been edited with a webmail service.