[Sussex] Forward: Another SLUG?

[Stephen Williams]

One could always go on to their site and Vote "No" in response to their
poll "is this site a good idea". Maybe they'll get the message.

Steve W.

On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 07:59 +0100, Desmond Armstrong wrote:
> >   http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.ukslug.org.uk
> >
> > And look what I found:
> >
> > OS:	Windows Server 2003
> > Server:	Apache/2.2.4 (Win32) DAV/2 mod_ssl/2.2.4 OpenSSL/0.9.8e PHP/5.2.3
> >
> > Would you pay money to join an organisation that doesn't even use the
> > software it claims to support?
> >
> > May I suggest that you forward their posting attempt (and this email if
> > you wish) to Novell.  They may wish to take action.
> >   
> I am pondering this one.
> Is this a result of the MS - Novell agreement?
> 
> Our purpose in the LUGs is open source and freedoms we cannot possibly 
> entertain any lockdowns into MS or their partners.
> If the intention is to set up a Suse group then that should be reflected 
> in the name.
> 
> __ 
> Sussex mailing list
> Sussex at mailman.lug.org.uk
> E-mail Address: sussex at mailman.lug.org.uk
> Sussex LUG Website: http://www.sussex.lug.org.uk/
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sussex