[Sussex] Ping of life?

[Steve Dobson]

Paul

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:58 +0000, Paul Tansom wrote: 
> ** Alan Pope <alan at popey.com> [2008-01-30 09:43]:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:45:54PM +0000, Paul Tansom wrote:
> > > Glad you copied me in on that reply. I've done a bit of checking and
> > > found that the List-Id has changed,
> > 
> > You sure about that? It's not changed in the last year or so that I recall, 
> > and I too use a filter based on List-Id.
> ** end quote [Alan Pope]
> 
> Yes, quite sure. Are you filtering based on the whole List-Id or just
> part of it?
> 
> Up to and including Jan 8th emails from this list have:
> 
> List-Id: LUG email list for the Sussex Counties <sussex.mailman.lug.org.uk>
> 
> Post Jan 8th they have:
> 
> List-Id: Sussex LUG <sussex.mailman.lug.org.uk>

Are that would be me; I did make a that edit.  I don't like long names and it had been 
bothering me for some time so I "fixed" it.   I didn't think of people filtering on 
the descriptive part.  Sorry.

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 11:20 +0000, Alan Pope wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:58:18AM +0000, Paul Tansom wrote:
> > Yes, quite sure. Are you filtering based on the whole List-Id or just
> > part of it?
> > 
> 
> Just the bit that matters :)
> 
> sussex.mailman.lug.org.uk 

I suggest that you follow Alan's example and filter on the "bit that
matters" as that
isn't likely to be changed often.

Steve
-- 
Steve Dobson

BOFH excuse #78:

Yes, yes, its called a design limitation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/sussex/attachments/20080130/be700271/attachment.pgp