[SWLUG] SSH tunelling

[Steve Hill]

On Fri, 13 May 2011, Chris Jackson wrote:

> You don't need to sign an agreement unless statute requires it (e.g.
> credit agreements before 2007 required a physical signature).  It's
> enough that you conduct yourself in a manner that signifies
> acceptance.

Might I suggest that breaking the T&Cs (specifically 3.2.1) might be 
construed as conducting yourself in a manner that signifies 
non-acceptance? :)

In any case, would a court of law really find that someone has implicitly 
agreed to some T&Cs that they almost certainly haven't read because they 
are hidden away on a tiny link at the bottom of a page?

-- 

  - Steve
    xmpp:steve at nexusuk.org   sip:steve at nexusuk.org   http://www.nexusuk.org/

      Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence