[Wiltshire] i2P - anonymous surfing for the masses

[Daniel Jake Davies]

Stick with Tor for now guys.

On 25 November 2011 19:42, Sharon <dillyg23 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Being ... no to switched on with all this.  What is the consensus then.
>
> Go for I2P or not.  I went and read a couple of reviews which were positive
> but I don't have the knowledge to know if this is a good or bad product?
>
> Advice gratefully received.
>
> Sharon
>
>
> On 25/11/11 14:25, Simon Iremonger (wiltslug) wrote:
>
>> Many applications are available that interface with I2P, including
>>> mail, peer-peer, IRC chat, and others
>>>
>> I would question...
>>
>> What does any of that do about the highly-accurate, complicated,
>> tracking going on in browsers...  that tie all the data
>> together, not just source-IP, think about complicated
>> crosscorrelation between cookies, flash-cookies, cached data,
>> logins, site-site agreements, user-agents, screen-res etc.. ?
>>
>> --Simon
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Wiltshire mailing list
>> Wiltshire at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/**mailman/listinfo/wiltshire<https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/wiltshire>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Wiltshire mailing list
> Wiltshire at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/**mailman/listinfo/wiltshire<https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/wiltshire>
>



-- 
(Daniel) Jake Davies
C1120627
BSc CompSci
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/wiltshire/attachments/20111125/184366de/attachment.htm>