[Wolves] Smoothwall with wireless router

[Matthew Revell]

Old Dan wrote:

> Well, no.  Not actually /need/....
>
> But then, when the average cost of smoothwall is bugger all squared 
> (using an older-but-reliable-box which is not much use for anything 
> else any more) and the person concerned is into Linux anyway then why 
> not?
>
I am that person :) If I can avoid SmoothWall, tho', I would like to; 
even if it's just at first. The reason for that is that I can think of 
better uses for a low end machine (eg central file storage) and I'd 
prefer not to have a machine burning electricity if I can avoid it.

If I have decent firewalling on each machine on the network, won't that 
be enough?