[Wolves] Smoothwall with wireless router
Old Dan
dan at dannyboy.dnsalias.org
Fri Feb 6 12:47:24 GMT 2004
Matthew Revell wrote:
> Old Dan wrote:
>
>> Well, no. Not actually /need/....
>>
>> But then, when the average cost of smoothwall is bugger all squared
>> (using an older-but-reliable-box which is not much use for anything
>> else any more) and the person concerned is into Linux anyway then why
>> not?
>>
> I am that person :) If I can avoid SmoothWall, tho', I would like to;
> even if it's just at first. The reason for that is that I can think of
> better uses for a low end machine (eg central file storage) and I'd
> prefer not to have a machine burning electricity if I can avoid it.
>
> If I have decent firewalling on each machine on the network, won't that
> be enough?
Yeah but that'll be restrictive especially if you're using a mixture of
Win machines and Linux machines and you want to do filesharing.
Win machines are notoriously hackable with filesharing enabled. Frankly
I wouldn't want to be without a decent firewall in that case.
--
Dan
More information about the Wolves
mailing list