[Wolves] Brumcon on Midlands Today
andy.wootton at wyrley.demon.co.uk
Mon Oct 4 20:45:31 BST 2004
Philip Moore wrote:
>There are many words that have been hijacked and misrepresented both
>syntactically and semantically to the detriment of the English language - I
>am sure we can all think of many examples but the term 'hacker' is a prime
>example of the desecration of the English language by the ignorant and
>misinformed (my view but there we go!).
>I will stick with the original derivation and meaning and ignore those who
>choose to use the corrupted (and incorrect in my eyes) meaning applied.
>A correct term I would propose for those miscreants who attack computer
>systems (if anyone is interested read the paper 'The Ethical Hacker') is
Philip is right. I can remember it changing. I was working in Cambridge
in about 1982 with a couple of Cambridge graduates who still had good
links with 'the Lab'. They were furious when the gutter press started
misusing 'their' jargon. There were subtle differences from the MIT
definitions. At Cambridge the term hacker tended to be applied to people
who loved computers but were not studying them officially. A 'hack' was
clever but probably also dirty (typical British self-deprecating
humour.) I'd studied Computer Science so I'd heard of the Internet then
but I'd never actually seen any remote connection faster than a 300 Baud
teletype. The PC was just being written off as a toy that would never
catch on by everyone but accountants so most people hadn't ever come
across the original meaning before it was corrupted. The fact that most
hackers were also crackers (it wasn't illegal yet and they 'needed' to
steal other people's on-line allowance to supplement their inadequate
allocation or get free phone time to feed their habbit) muddied the
water a tad.
My misuse of language rant: "Methodology" is the study of methods. SSADM
etc. are methods, not methodologies. The difference is useful.
More information about the Wolves