[Wolves] Fedora Core 3
Peter Cannon
peter at cannon-linux.freeserve.co.uk
Thu Jan 20 09:59:30 GMT 2005
On Thursday 20 January 2005 09:38, sparkes wrote:
> The only updates you should make to a stable released product are
> security fixes and as these are all made available to users online (and
> via yum or whatever package management tools you use) this is the
> expected behaviour.
You misunderstand me :-) what I meant was I don't think they can be arsed to
put a 'fresh, up to date iso up' not a new release. As you pointed out some
time ago Fedora isn't a stable release in the strictest sense it is, as
clearly stated on Redhats site, an off shoot testbed.
The stable releases are Redhat pay-for products.
> I would be more wary of a product that released massive iso's every time
> a fix comes out than one that releases a stable product and leaves it as
> finished.
But as you said "Its a dead end distribution as it will never be finished" ;-)
--
Regards,
Peter Cannon.
peter at cannon-linux.freeserve.co.uk
Fedora Core 3 & Suse Pro 9.2
"There is every excuse for not knowing
there is no excuse for not asking"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/wolves/attachments/20050120/cc3de140/attachment.bin
More information about the Wolves
mailing list