andy at lug.org.uk
Thu Jan 11 20:45:41 GMT 2007
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:27:21PM +0000, Adam Sweet wrote:
> --- Andy Smith <andy at lug.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:25:28PM +0000, Adam Sweet
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > Is anyone using Xen?
> > Yes, rather a lot (see signature) :)
> Yeah, I've read your Xen hosting Wiki quite a few
> times as it happens, while I haven't set Xen up yet,
> the features provided by your hosting seem pretty
> intimidating :) Anyway, I was hoping you would pipe up
Well if you are today looking to run a virtual server hosting
service on open source software then I think your only viable
choices are Xen and Virtuozzo. UML is far too slow.
I have not had first hand experience with Virtuozzo but I have
researched it a fair bit. It's a bit like BSD jails in that it's a
sort of super chroot -- everything runs under one kernel. I have
read that it offers slightly more performance than Xen (which makes
sense since it's a more lightweight form of virtualisation), and it
has a more mature system of measuring out resources.
You can't give different virtual servers different kernels, and you
can't run anything other than Linux, but to be honest I have never
had to do that so far with Xen anyway. One guy asked for Plan 9 but
I was out of capacity at the time and he went to Black Cat I
From what I can see, Fedora and SuSe are putting the most effort
into packaging Xen -- Debian actually uses a Fedora patch for its
Xen packaged kernel. But I have had no real problems making things
work with Debian Sarge and now Etch.
Just a few thoughts..
http://strugglers.net/wiki/Xen_hosting -- A Xen VPS hosting hobby
Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0x604DE5DB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/wolves/attachments/20070111/bfe68b7a/attachment.bin
More information about the Wolves