[Wolves] Fw: Learn How You Can Enable DMARC, SPF, DKIM the Right Way!
dick_turpin at archlinux.us
Tue Nov 26 15:10:35 UTC 2019
On 26/11/2019 14:21, Stephen Parkes wrote:
> " I apologise unreservedly for any offence you feel aggrieved about. "
> That's not an apology is it?
Is it not? It is in my book. I could have said nothing and let your
temper tantrum fester.
> This is an apology. I would like to apologise in advance for the images
> in this message.
Ahaha, that's a bit like saying sorry prior to kicking someone in the
nuts. "But I did apologise." #facepalm
> So in the interests of openness this is everything that was said
> privately between myself and Peter. Is it wrong to call a bigot a cunt
> once in a while or question why they took 10 minutes when their bigotry
> was pointed out to them. It only takes a few seconds to say you're on a
> call but Peter either can't see the issue or can't defend it and since
> I'm completely open about my Autism (and that of my children) and we
> follow each other on social media you would think the issue wouldn't
> have escaped him.
Think yourself lucky I took 10 minutes. I could have taken a couple of
days. I happen to be at work at the moment next time I'm on the phone
and 20,000 notifications pop up on my screen so close to one-another
they could have been a single message I'll take a photo for you to prove
I'm actually on the phone seeing as you don't believe anything anyone
says with out cold , hard, definitive facts.
Not sure what your autism has to do with anything other than, I presume,
associating "High functioning" with autism which are not the same thing
and therefore not the intension.
> Peter thinks I've been on his case recently. I can only presume it's
> because I counter his arguments with facts in a public forum. Peter
> doesn't like facts but every other interaction we've had on Twitter not
> contained above is entirely public because I'm not hiding anything and I
> think I'm well within my rights to call out a bigot making personal
> attacks when they make them.
Your facts are only facts that conform to your views as were the facts I
produced however it would seem that you felt your facts were better than
mine. Sadly, I have been used to that attitude most of my life until a
few years down the line when it has come to light I was right all along.
If you feel I'm a bigot, so be it. I'm not going to beat myself up about
it. You clearly felt aggrieved. I apologised. I'm sorry that wasn't good
enough for you I'm not sure what would acceptable other than my head on
> It's not like the good old days at all is it though? I defended you
> multiple times from attacks I thought stepped over the line.
You have and I appreciated and appreciate it which is why I feel pretty
hurt at your behaviour over the last few weeks and why I apologised
unreservedly however it would seem that for you the party is over which
is sad but such is life. I have no idea what more to say. I've done all
you demanded in your avalanche of communications, for me I have nothing
further to say.
IRC: dick_turpin @ freenode.net
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't
matter and those who matter don't mind."
More information about the Wolves