OT: The sig flame war starts here (was Re: [Gllug] Microsoft 'tnef' files)

[Nix]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, tet at accucard.com muttered drunkenly:
> 
>>> So that's a compelling argument for having more sig than message?
>>
>>Yes.
> 
> Wrong answer. There is no justification for *ever* having more sig
> than message. If you've got that little to say, don't bother. If you
> have more to say, then why drown it out with an oversized B1FF sig?

One-line message, fortune monster chooses two-line sig: not a terrible
crime.

Fifteen-line sig, regardless of message length: no thanks.

-- 
`There's something satisfying about killing JWZ over and over again.'
                                        -- 1i, personal communication


-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug