[Gllug] ADSL or cable?
David Damerell
damerell at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Mon Nov 11 11:37:23 UTC 2002
On Monday, 11 Nov 2002, Tethys wrote:
>Most people assume cable to be faster because it gives higher bandwidth
>numbers. What they don't tell you is that with that you get higher
>contention ratios. The last number I heard were 200:1 for NTL's cable
>service.
This seems rather unlikely. We have this service, and usually can get
the full speed out of it even at 'high' times of day. I don't know the
contention ratio, but it seems highly unlikely that it is 200:1. We
have had it in 2 different areas, so it is not just that we are in an
area unusually undersubscribd.
>more likely to be able to find an unfiltered pure IP connection. With
>cable, the providers seem more likely to prevent you running servers,
>for example, and may well block certain (or in some cases all) incoming
>ports. Of course, this can apply to ADSL too, depending on your ISP, but
>it seems that cable providers are more anal about it.
There only _are_ 2 cable providers. I can't speak for Telewest, but
NTL only restrict world-accessible servers (and this is a political,
not a technical restriction; if they see huge chunks of traffic, then
they lean on you) and do not appear to block any incoming ports. The
service is also cheaper than ADSL _if_ you also require cable
television (if you don't, it is very difficult to impossible to get
the service without TV, effectively raising the price to 40-odd quid a
month if you have no use for the TV service).
In general NTL seem to have a sensible technical setup; the problem is
the gross incompetence of their customer service and billing
departments.
--
David Damerell <damerell at chiark.greenend.org.uk> flcl?
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list