[Gllug] Discussion: Is Enterprise Linux a lock-in

[Bruce Richardson]

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:40:23AM +0000, Nix wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Bruce Richardson uttered the following:
> > Even strong supporters of the GPL are finding it hard to support some of
> > RMS' latest tactics, such as the more restrictive clauses in the GFDL.
> 
> That's not because they're `too free', it's because they're not free
> enough.

I got that.

> RMS admits this, but says his aims are less ambitious than
> the people who's prefer more freedom.

It looks, to me, as if he's being more ambitious.  That is, he has the
ambition of being rather more pro-active in pushing free software and
going over the top in the attempt.

-- 
Bruce

Bitterly it mathinketh me, that I spent mine wholle lyf in the lists
against the ignorant.  -- Roger Bacon, "Doctor Mirabilis"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20040124/6be3e58b/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug