[Gllug] How can Spam bypass SpamAssassin entirely?
Ben Fitzgerald
ben_m_f at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Oct 26 17:23:08 UTC 2004
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 05:46:42PM +0100, John Winters wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 17:35, John Winters wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Ignore that query. I discovered spamd wasn't running because NIS had
> pinched its network port.
>
> Does anyone else have problems with NIS/NFS helping itself to ports used
> by, for instance, spamassassin and cupsys? I've had it happen a number
> of times recently but the response I've had from maintainers is that
> it's just one of those things and there's nothing you can do about it.
> Doesn't sound right to me.
You can bind nfs related daemons to static port numbers, as described
here:
http://www.lowth.com/LinWiz/nfs_help.html
I guess you could take the same approach with NIS? Haven't tried that
one myself...
Ben
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list