[Gllug] glibc2.6.1 problem - Urgent!

[Nix]

On 1 Dec 2007, Yashpal Nagar verbalised:
> Nix wrote:
>> Nah, those symptoms are clear: upgrading glibc installed a new
>> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 symlink, and uninstalling it blew that symlink away
>> and didn't replace it.
>>
>>   
> Does it mean, re-installing of glibc-2.3.3 once again (though it is 
> already installed), will replace all those such links? I have 

I'd certainly expect it to.

> glibc-2.3.3 and glibc-2.6.1, installed by Mr mate with "--force" option 
> in rpm.

I hope he's learnt why --force is nearly always a bad idea...

> Could anyone help, how could glibc-2.6.1 be removed, with only having 
> native glibc-2.3.3 for SLES 9 distribution ?

(I'll leave answering that to someone who actually uses SUSE.)

-- 
`Some people don't think performance issues are "real bugs", and I think 
such people shouldn't be allowed to program.' --- Linus Torvalds
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug