[Gllug] Playing with a deployment idea - PXE, bittorrent, remote location
Peter Childs
peterachilds at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 10:34:42 UTC 2007
On 10/07/07, Alan Peery <peery at io.com> wrote:
>
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Alan Peery wrote:
> >
> >> * Bittorrent style download of remainder of distribution, source
> >>
> >
> > Why bittorrent? If the server
> Because I have waved a magic wand and made the server in the branch
> disappear. I am trying to get the benefits of a local cache without
> having a local server. One way is to have the clients at the remote
> site act as bittorrent peers, so you end up having only (package bytes
> *1 + bittorrent control * N) bytes cross the WAN to get the package
> bytes to all clients. A second benefit is having a local cache of
> packages that would generally survive any loss of a single machine.
>
> Now a WAN acceleration vendor like Riverbed would recommend dropping one
> of their boxes in the stream, but I am trying to keep as close to bare
> IP network pipe and clean Linux distribution as possible.
>
>
Are you basically suggesting using something like...
Debian Net install with a bittorrent package archive, or something more like
LTSP.
I don't see why you should not adapt apt to work with bittorrent rather
than http, ftp, or cdrom which is already does.
Peter.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20070710/45e17200/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list