[Gllug] Playing with a deployment idea - PXE, bittorrent, remote location

Peter Childs peterachilds at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 10:34:42 UTC 2007


On 10/07/07, Alan Peery <peery at io.com> wrote:
>
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Alan Peery wrote:
> >
> >>     * Bittorrent style download of remainder of distribution, source
> >>
> >
> > Why bittorrent? If the server
> Because I have waved a magic wand and made the server in the branch
> disappear.  I am trying to get the benefits of a local cache without
> having a local server.  One way is to have the clients at the remote
> site act as bittorrent peers, so you end up having only (package bytes
> *1 + bittorrent control * N) bytes cross the WAN to get the package
> bytes to all clients.  A second benefit is having a local cache of
> packages that would generally survive any loss of a single machine.
>
> Now a WAN acceleration vendor like Riverbed would recommend dropping one
> of their boxes in the stream, but I am trying to keep as close to bare
> IP network pipe and clean Linux distribution as possible.
>
>
Are you basically suggesting using something like...

Debian Net install with a bittorrent package archive, or something more like
LTSP.
 I don't see why you should not adapt apt to work with bittorrent rather
than http, ftp, or cdrom which is already does.


Peter.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20070710/45e17200/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug


More information about the GLLUG mailing list