[Klug-general] gnome = kde?
J D Freeman
klug at quixotic.org.uk
Wed May 9 23:59:17 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:52:17PM +0100, Shish wrote:
> What sort of differences are you looking for? Apart from the look,
> there's not much else a user sees; and a large part of the look is
> customisable in each anyway....
>
> Internally, they use different widget toolkits, based on different
> languages; they each have their own set of libraries, there isn't
> really anything in common between them (they're both built on top of
> the same things, but I don't count third party foundations as part of
> either project~)
Aaaah, which level of abstraction to view them at.
> Try both, see which one you like best, use that one.
To fully evaluate, try all three options:
0) Gnome
1) KDE
2) Neither
> > no "kde/gnome is crap use fvwm" messages etc..
>
> Why not? Is being well informed about a variety of options a bad thing
> o_O?
It risks degenerating into a holy war, after all we all know fvm sucks,
vi is the only way forward, and anyone with sense uses evilwm ( Tongue
firmly in cheek)
> Personally I run enlightenment dr16, mostly as a way to have many
> xterms visible at once :P
What else is a window mangler for :p
evilwm plus screen, making peoples heads hurt since 2004.
J
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGQlKy42M0lILkmGIRAjOsAJ9LIoumVKH+HSlFM+NU6QHog4DUjgCg5Jsm
f0xNnYbMQ/DfpEwOGvSyndw=
=s0vS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Kent
mailing list