[Lust] No more Lust ?

[Lee McFadden]

--=======60796A85=======
Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-2B7F528F; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The main reason that I joined the Lust lug was because the Beds lug was i=
n=20
Bedford and the Herts one was based in Stevenage...  both too far for me =
to=20
go at this point in time.  St Albans/Luton are the best places for me to =
go=20
since they are the closest.

If i had a choice, I'd keep it, but then it depends what everyone else=20
thinks :)

Lee

At 15:28 03/06/2003 +0100, you wrote:

>Hi all,
>Been a while since we spoke :)
>I've been having some thoughts regarding the LUG.
>Basically LUSTLUG sprang up from an interest in forming a local LUG,
>myself and a friend from Luton (Hi Ian !) decided we'd do it between us
>and an initial look on lug.org.uk didn't show up any.
>I didn't realise at the time that there was already a Herts LUG as it's
>listed in the central area which I took to mean Central UK, i.e.
>Birmingham, Leicester etc.. Also about the same time Neil Darlow
>registered Beds LUG.
>The Herts LUG appears to be based in around Stevenage, and they do have
>regular meetings here, Not sure where Beds are based, but Luton must be
>a key area for Beds. Anyhow, there seems little point in duplication, so
>I'm thinking about relocating the LUG to South Herts. possibly
>Watford/St. Albans to make it easier to meet arrange any meetings.
>The main point is that the LUG belongs to the members (you!), so what's
>the consensus of opinion ?
>When subscribing to this list what was it that you were looking for ?
>Anyone have any strong views either way ?
>Possibly we could meet up somewhere to discuss it further ?
>I'm open to suggestions.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Mike
>
>
>Mike Culverhouse
>LUSTLUG Co-ordinator
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Lust mailing list
>Lust@mailman.lug.org.uk
>http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/lust
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 19/05/2003

--=======60796A85=======
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-avg=cert; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-2B7F528F
Content-Disposition: inline


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 19/05/2003

--=======60796A85=======--