[Nottingham] looking for an AGP4 graphics card with good Linux
support
Michael Simms
michael at linuxgamepublishing.com
Tue Apr 4 11:14:36 BST 2006
OK, for open source drivers, ATI is ahead of nvidia. Thats simply
because the closed nvidia drivers are way ahead of ATI's
Best: nvidia closed
2nd : ATI closed
3rd : ATI open
4th : nvidia open
5th : Just about anything else
The gap has closed recently, but Id always recommend nvidia right now. A
GF6600 will let you run pretty much anything on the market to date (tho
we have a game in the works that will stutter a little on a 6600) A
GF7800 is well supported and will likely run anything for the next
couple of years that we see on Linux, but they are still a bit pricey.
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 10:59 +0100, Michael Erskine wrote:
> A technical question (of all things!),
>
> I run blunt-edge hardware (not wealthy enough to run cutting edge machines!)
> and my Athlon 2000 machine shows its age when it comes to Doom3 (playable
> until new textures are swapped in). I'm currently running a geforce4mx (NV17)
> card with nvidia drivers for Xorg - this card was free so I'm rather pleased
> in general. The mainboard (syntax SV266a) will only accept AGP4 - I'm looking
> for anything with better performance that the NV17 for a reasonable price.
> Perhaps an ATI somethingorother -- I'm not familiar with the ATI product
> range at all :)
>
> At the end of the day, the machine is used mostly as a development workstation
> but I would like to play xgl with it!
>
> Any guidance would be most welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Michael Erskine.
>
--
Michael Simms - CEO, Linux Game Publishing
http://www.linuxgamepublishing.com
More information about the Nottingham
mailing list