[Nottingham] Linux turns 25 -- corporate contributors now key to its future

[Jason Irwin]

On 28 August 2016 at 23:59, Neal Ponton via Nottingham <
nottingham at mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Was also reading about Intel's version of Linux yesterday. It's called
> 'Clear Linux' and is very minimal, designed to have containers bolted onto
> it, like CoreOS. I've just had a better look at that, too, and it seems
> Intel are using the Creative Commons license. Not sure if that's more or
> less gooder than the GPL or what?
>
CC for *code*? What? I thought the advice was that CC was a really license
for code, what with GPL/BSD/MIT/Anything being better suited.

Normally the code is GPL and other assets some CC-variant. I wonder what is
going on.

J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/nottingham/attachments/20160828/17802a90/attachment.html>